ESL Forum:
Techniques and methods
in Language Teaching
Games, activities
and teaching ideas
Grammar and
Linguistics
Teaching material
Concerning
worksheets
Concerning
powerpoints
Concerning online
exercises
Make suggestions,
report errors
Ask for help
Message board
|
ESL forum >
Grammar and Linguistics > Phonetics of the possessive ´s : BOSS ´
Phonetics of the possessive ´s : BOSS ´
caritush
|
Phonetics of the possessive ´s : BOSS ´
|
I ´m teaching possessive ´s right now, and according to the grammar rules, when a word ends in s, we add the apostrophe to its right and don ´t add an extra s, "kids ´" and we pronounce it as if it didn ´t have the possessive.
The thing is, I realize that when I say the boss ´ wife, I add a shwa sound, I say the "bosiz" wife... How come?? Is there a rule about that? I ´ve tried looking it up but I found nothing |
17 Jul 2009
|
|
|
|
Jayho
|
Yes there is a pronunciation rule for possessives - you can read about it at this link:
Cheers
Jayho |
18 Jul 2009
|
|
PhilipR
|
When a plural noun ends in ´s ´ there is no need to add an extra s, just an apostrophe.
When a singular noun end in ´s ´, add an apostrophe plus an extra s (e.g. Luis ´s class, St James ´s Park), with unfortunately just a few EXCEPTIONS (e.g. Jesus ´ apostles plus phonetical exceptions).
This last rule, however, has been violated by so many over the last years (Luis ´ class, James ´ wife), that both forms are now gradually being accepted. I guess language and grammar are really alive.
|
18 Jul 2009
|
|
caritush
|
OK thanks guys. One one link it was mentioned more or less..... that basically there ´s not that much of a rule about that :/
I know the grammar, I studied it all my life and then agian in the teacher training course... but at the same time I spent some time living in the states when i was a teen and acquired (as in, an uncoscious process) many aspects vocab and prnunciation based on the usage rather than the rules, and sometime she two types of knowledge collide and there isn ´t a good answer to slve the problem...
That ´s the thing with English I guess, the use many times molds the grammar instead of the other way around
Anyways, thanks guys! |
18 Jul 2009
|
|
|