Hi all,
 
As you know by now (for this is my umpteenth posting requesting advice and help) I �m a brand new teacher and I �ve got a very advanced class.
 
Here lie the problem:  THESE GUYS KNOW EVERY RULE ABOUT GRAMMAR!  They �ve been through ALL levels, graduated from one to the next, and KNOW THEIR STUFF.
 
Today was a �magic moment � day - I was gearing up to do my first (rather nerve-wracking) lesson in RELATIVE CLAUSES and THEY KNEW EVERYTHING!
 
Thank Goodness I was prepared for a complete change in lesson plan.  
 
The advice I �m looking for is this:  Is it ok to TOTALLY focus my lessons on SPEAKING (predominantly) and LISTENING/READING/WRITING?  
 
One of my korean students came up to me at break and requested we have a debate when we go back into the class - she felt we were doing too much writing and studying of english and, by her own admition: "can do that on my own with my grammar book � - I of course am VERY OPEN to the idea - no one REALLY wants to teach/learn grammar, lets be honest.
 
I went back into class and had a short chat with the students about this - they agreed that grammar was not where they wanted to focus, but rather on speaking and listening - reading/writing sometimes, but not as important at SPEAKING.
 
Is this ok?  Am I being a push-over in allowing my students to choose the lesson structure and focus?  I �m all for autonomised learning (wish I had more control when I was at school) but is there �too much of a good thing? �  
 
Again, these guys �n girls know and seem to have a good handle (possibly better than myself) and are ADVANCED - some doing the TOEFL next month.  I feel OK, but I also don �t feel like I �m imparting any knowledge as a teacher would.
 
Thanks in advance for your advice and thank you in general for your on going support,
 
Regards from Sunny RSA:) (any South African teachers in other countries out there? would love to hear from you!)
 
AND THANKS TO THE TEACHER WHO POINTED OUT THE ERROR IN THIS AD!  APPRECIATED!