|
Silvia33
|
I have a doubt
|
|
Hi everyone!!
I �m just curious and maybe someone can help me. Why do only my name and comment appear when I report a ws and not the red and green options below?
Am I doing something wrong? Or forgetting something?
Thanks in advance!
Silvia |
30 Aug 2009
|
|
|
|
goodnesses
|
No silvia you are not doing anything wrong. It is normal.
It �s a question of logic; the one who report can �t vote for or against a WS.
|
30 Aug 2009
|
|
|
Silvia33
|
|
Dear goodnesses, have a look at the reported contributions. When other people report, the sentences are there, even if they are the FIRST ones to report!  |
30 Aug 2009
|
|
|
zailda
|
Silvia, when you report a ws the optiions aren �t there for you but they appear for us.
As goodnesses said, you are not to vote again for a ws you reported yourself. Believe me, you �re doing it the correct way.
|
30 Aug 2009
|
|
|
Silvia33
|
Silly me!!!!! 
Thanks a lot dear friends!!!! 
Silvia |
30 Aug 2009
|
|
|
mena22
|
|
Hi Silvia! When you can �t see the option to vote it means you have already voted for that worksheet. It happens when a worksheet has been in the reported contribution �s page before. The majority of members voted for it to stay and now it has been reported again. But you can only vote once. The same happens when you are the one to report the worksheet. When you report it, you are already voting for its removal, so no right to vote again though you can always write another comment.
Have a good night.
mena |
30 Aug 2009
|
|
|
Silvia33
|
|
Thanks a lot, dear Mena!!!
Silvia |
30 Aug 2009
|
|
|
zailda
|
That �s what I see at the reporting page.
|
30 Aug 2009
|
|
|
goodnesses
|
To all,
just observe carefully. When "you " report a WS you cannot vote for it. Go check the WS you have just reported. You will not see the options for voting but the other moderators can see your name and the options.
I think it is wise from Victor. You cannot be a judge and a police officer in the same time.
EDIT:
Zailda your last post mislead me. So, sincerely sorry. Things were already made clear.
|
30 Aug 2009
|
|
|
abdel
|
I think it is wise from Victor. You cannot be a judge and a police officer in the same time.
i guess we say : ........AT the same time
and the past of mislead is MISLED ; you should �ve used the past. sorry anyway! |
30 Aug 2009
|
|
|
goodnesses
|
@ Adel
At least be sure of what you say before correcting people �s typos publicly!
|
30 Aug 2009
|
|
