But if it was four or five users who each have 1000 points or more, then one person abusing it is much less likely. That�s the point of having it reconfirmed 3 or 4 times by other people. And if one of the users abuse it too much (which will probably only happen once or twice anyway) then they can get banned from being able to use the function.

�For the function to be abused with this system, one person would have to set up five accounts and get 1000 points in each or five different corrupt people would have to flag it (or something in between)- very unlikely.

�But I�m only putting my two cents� worth in.

�It�s not going to kill me and it is a little pedantic pointing it out, but would people remember that "dareka1" put forward the idea of freezing the worksheet downloads and then having 1000 points? It seems everyone is getting credit for the idea but me.

That�s a good idea (Victor). A way of giving compensation in kind/ a chance to try it again to the person whose worksheet was unfairly flagged.

�Putting the download link at the bottom is in principle a �nice idea, but it would get tiresome scrolling down all the time, especially if there were 200 comments (on the assumption it was a good worksheet and everyone said thank you). And, speaking only for me, I don�t want everyone to say thank you, I�d like maybe five thank yous and 2000 downloads �. Enough thank yous to make me feel good, and no more.

Whatever you will do Victor, it will be perfect. I don�t know the solution to this problem. I agree with dareka that having the download link at the very bottom can be tiresome (specially when you should scroll down 50 comments).

I�m not sure on the blackmail part, usually the most likely result turns out to be the one that happens, but-

� "Let�s try not to ask too much from Victor and behave as teachers who represent all the noble principles (I mean those acting the reprehensible way)."goodnesses

I can agree with you on that point (as I can that there is always a loophole to be exploited). It�s easier for me to give out suggestions because I�m not running the show. It�ll be a hard choice because for Victor because all the consequences of any change made can�t be seen until they happen.

�The one point is though, at least it seems to me, it�s not about loopholes as such, it�s about being stupidly, openly deceitful. If I stole an expensive watch from a friend, I wouldn�t wear it while visiting his house, out to a night club with other friends would be better (as an analogy). As in we all know it will happen, do it with some discretion please and don�t rub our faces in it.