ESL Forum:
Techniques and methods
in Language Teaching
Games, activities
and teaching ideas
Grammar and
Linguistics
Teaching material
Concerning
worksheets
Concerning
powerpoints
Concerning online
exercises
Make suggestions,
report errors
Ask for help
Message board
|
ESL forum >
Grammar and Linguistics > So/Neither do/have I- Agreeing and Disagreeing
So/Neither do/have I- Agreeing and Disagreeing
douglas
|
So/Neither do/have I- Agreeing and Disagreeing
|
So/neitherHi All,
I�m working on a worksheet and need some clarification concerning So/neither do/have I.
When agreeing or disagreeing using so/neither the general response structure is:
so/neither + aux/modal verb + pronoun
example:
I like pizza. So do I.
I have been to Spain. So have I.
I am tired. So am I.
Question: what is the structure if "have" is my main verb?
I have a cat. So do I. (or) So have I.
My gut feel and common usage tells me "So do I" is correct (using aux), but I don�t want to teach my students wrong. Are both acceptable? Is only one acceptable? Is one more formal than the other? Is this a GB/US usage thing?
I look forward to your answers and thanks in advance.
Douglas |
18 Mar 2011
|
|
|
arkel
|
We would probably say I �ve got a cat. So have I, but I would certainly accept I have a cat. So do I. Maybe it has something to do with British (I �ve got) and American (I have)?
Hope this helps you somewhat Douglas. Rosemary:)
|
18 Mar 2011
|
|
almaz
|
According to the British grammarian, Michael Swan, the structure so + aux. + subject (where the answer/agreement to the sentence before uses the same auxiliary verb (as in your examples ...Spain ...tired)) can also be used with non-auxiliary have (and be) as you noted:
I have a hangover. So have I.
As in your example, I like pizza, we use do/does/did after a clause with no auxiliary verb. Since have in the sentence above is not an auxiliary, then there is no reason not to use do/does/did if you so wish:
I have a hangover. So do I.
I �d say it was really a question of choice or style. I �m perfectly happy to use either; there �s certainly no possible ambiguity or loss of meaning. And for worksheet purposes, choose the one you �re comfortable with.
Alex |
18 Mar 2011
|
|
Tatyana83
|
I �ve got a dog - so have I. - Br. Eng I � have a dog - so do I - Br.Eng.
I have a dog. So have I - looks like American Eng.
|
18 Mar 2011
|
|
yanogator
|
No, in the US it would be, "I have a dog. So do I". Bruce |
18 Mar 2011
|
|
Zora
|
Hi Douglas,
I would personally use "so, do I" with have sentences. My reasons behind this are the following:
The verb "have to" is not the same as the verb "have/have got" and we all know that we can make sentences like the following:
I have to go to bed at eight o �clock. So do I. � "So have I" would be wrong here since the verb "have" is not being used in the sense of possession. Nobody owns or possesses anything here.
So to avoid any confusion, I would say that they should use, so do I, just because it �s correct to use both and it causes less confusion in the long run. The students do not need to distinguish between the verb have/have got and the verb have to.
Cheers, Linda
|
18 Mar 2011
|
|
edrodmedina
|
I don �t know what �s going on. Everyone sounds a little schizophrenic here. "I like pizza. So do I." |
18 Mar 2011
|
|
pilarmham
|
Have can be both a full verb and an auxiliary. In the first case, it requires "do". When it is followed by got it is its own auxiliary, so we should say:
I have got a cat - So have I, though So do I is also possible (especially in American English). BUT:
I have a cat allows both possibilities too!: So do I & So have I.
BUT (again..):
I have eaten pizza. Here have is an auxiliary, so So have I is the only possible answer
I have to go is normally answered with So do I
Edddddddddd, I think I deserve some of that pizza of yours now, isn �t I????
|
18 Mar 2011
|
|
edrodmedina
|
I believe you do Pilar. Doesn �t she? |
18 Mar 2011
|
|
yanogator
|
Ed, your comment reminds me of the poem: Roses are red. Violets are blue. I �m schizophrenic, And so am I. Bruce |
18 Mar 2011
|
|
edrodmedina
|
LOL Bruce. I was trying to remember that poem when I read the post. Robin Williams has used it a few times. |
18 Mar 2011
|
|
1
2
Next >
|