ESL Forum:
Techniques and methods
in Language Teaching
Games, activities
and teaching ideas
Grammar and
Linguistics
Teaching material
Concerning
worksheets
Concerning
powerpoints
Concerning online
exercises
Make suggestions,
report errors
Ask for help
Message board
|
ESL forum >
Grammar and Linguistics > If she was / were?
If she was / were?

dagn
|
If she was / were?
|
Good evening guys!
I �m sorry to bother you but I happen to be a very poor teacher when it comes to grammar or linguistics!
what would you rather say:
"If she was alive, how old would she be?" OR "If she were alive, how old would she be?" and why?
Thanks for your help!
|
10 Sep 2011
|
|
|

zeina monzer
|
good evening ,
it �s "If she were"
were is used with all the pronouns in "if clause"
this site may help you
|
10 Sep 2011
|
|

lovemykids
|
Hi dagn!
This is called the past subjunctive of the verb to be and you can use it both ways; was or were no matter which is the subject of the sentence. Hope it helps!
Cheers! |
10 Sep 2011
|
|

lovemykids
|
...it seems I �m wrong Can anyone help me now???
thanks! |
10 Sep 2011
|
|

Kate (kkcat)
|
Both are fine :) I prefer the first way of saying it, sounds more natural to me. I �d say, the sentence with -was- is informal, while the one with -were- is just what we have all been taught and represents traditional English Grammar. With AmE, things have changed and things have become a teeny bit easier, but again, I�ve heard that in spoken language...My fav American writer still uses -were- in all kinds of such sentences :)
|
11 Sep 2011
|
|

Tere-arg
|
After IF we use a past subjunctive.
The past subjunctive coincides with the simple past in form, except for the verb "to be" which always takes were.
So the grammatically correct form is were. Anyway, when speaking (= informal language) was is acceptable.
|
11 Sep 2011
|
|

lovemykids
|
Thanks a lot Tere and Kate. I �ve always used, heard and seen them written both ways.
Kind regards from cold Uruguay! |
11 Sep 2011
|
|

almaz
|
Both are grammatically correct, Veronique - and there�s certainly no
real semantic distinction, as far as I�m concerned. �Was� is often preferred
for emphasis. In any case, �were� is considered more of a relic than an
actual past subjunctive. Think of Shakespeare:
If it were done when �tis done, then �twere well it were done quickly
(this is before Macbeth murders Duncan)
And remember that �if� doesn �t always introduce an unreal condition, which
means that it doesn�t require a subjunctive anyway ("If Malcolm was in my
class at school, he certainly didn�t stand out").
|
11 Sep 2011
|
|

libertybelle
|
Get yourself
Practical English Usage by Michael Swan.It is a great book to look up things - and your grammar will improve too!
|
11 Sep 2011
|
|

dagn
|
thanks to all of you for your answers. Libertybelle: I �ll get that book because I really need something else than school books to improve my (poor) grammar! |
11 Sep 2011
|
|

dagn
|
thanks to all of you for your answers. Libertybelle: I �ll get that book because I really need something else than school books to improve my (poor) grammar! |
11 Sep 2011
|
|
|