ESL Forum:
Techniques and methods
in Language Teaching
Games, activities
and teaching ideas
Grammar and
Linguistics
Teaching material
Concerning
worksheets
Concerning
powerpoints
Concerning online
exercises
Make suggestions,
report errors
Ask for help
Message board
|
ESL forum >
Concerning worksheets > Today in the recent contributions I noticed that...
Today in the recent contributions I noticed that...
silvia.patti
|
Today in the recent contributions I noticed that...
|
1) there is a worksheet uploaded five times for a computer glitch 2) there is a worksheet divided in two parts, perhaps because the frame is heavy
I suggest: 1) If we notice a computer glitch, we should download ALWAYS the same ws so that the others get 0 points and after a month they will be eliminated 2) I �m going to ask Victor to add a new report voice: "worksheets divided in parts without reason", so that everyone has to compress images and frames.
I think that these two ideas could help us not to overload the site.
Thanks
|
16 Oct 2011
|
|
|
maryse pey�
|
if technically it is possible, it may be a good idea Silvia. |
16 Oct 2011
|
|
cagreis
|
Silvia, this has happened to me before... sometimes uploading a ws takes too long and if you click "sent" more than once it will upload the same ws again and again. What I do is simply to delete the repeated ws before it gets any points. |
16 Oct 2011
|
|
lizsantiago
|
silvia, up till a few weeks back we were able to report repeated ws, but victor introduce a new warning into the reporting system that cancel the possibility of reporting and removing them. and as far of downloading one so the other is removed after a month, let me tell you that i have a few ws that havent been dw in more than a year and they are still here. i am pretty sure that the removing after a month rule has never worked. victor usually asks us when implanting a new rule, but he didnt ask us for the "no removing because of a glitch" so i guess it was because he doesnt mind having 5 or 6 ws of the same thing. and dear silvia how do we know a ws is divided for no reason?
|
16 Oct 2011
|
|
silvia.patti
|
Liz, if you see a ws with (for example) exercises 1 and 2 and then a second ws with exercise 3 and 4, don �t you think it is divided because of the frame/pictures??? Look at yesterday contributions and you �ll see what I mean.
Bye, Silvia
|
17 Oct 2011
|
|
|