|   
			ESL Forum: 
			
			
			
			Techniques and methods 
			in Language Teaching 
			
			Games, activities 
			and teaching ideas 
			
			Grammar and 
			Linguistics 
			
			
			Teaching material 
			
			
			Concerning 
			worksheets 
			
			
			Concerning 
			powerpoints 
			
			
			Concerning online 
			exercises 
			
			
			Make suggestions, 
			report errors 
			
			
			Ask for help 
			
			
			
			Message board 
			  
			
			
			
			
			 | 
 		
		
		ESL forum >
		
		
		Grammar and Linguistics > What´s he/she look like?     
			
		 What´s he/she look like? 
		
			| 
 
					
					
					
				 
 |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 yanogator
 
   | 
						
							| OK, Alex, I �ll withdraw the word "lazy" and go with ellipsis, but I still disagree with calling it a contraction, while admitting that I �m really arguiing over nothing.   Bruce |  13 Oct 2012     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 mr.sneeze
 
   | 
						
							| What �s he/she look like?
 So. In one sentence ...
 
 The abbreviation of �does� is not �allowed� in the written language but is widely used in the spoken language.
 
 @yanogator Your statement that it is �just a lazy pronunciation� is not far off the mark at all. �Lazy� connotes negativity of the abbreviated use of �does� and perhaps �Ellipsis� is more technically correct. We could say that the omission of �doe� is a practical one. It�s just faster to speak this way and I believe in the states �What does ...� often sounds more like �Waduz ...� !
 @ldthemagicman Your impromptu sentence  ï¿½Where�s she work?�put a smile on my face. In Bermuda (where I�m from) many �natives� actually say �Where�s she work at?�
  contractions go in and out of fashion: does not was traditionally contracted to don�t until the 19th century (just look at any of the Restoration playwrights, for example).
 @almaz
 very interesting as many of today�s youth (especially the rapper type) have returned to using �He/She don�t �" If only they knew! :)
 
 Thanks to all for taking the time out to address this question. Mr.Sneeze |  13 Oct 2012     
					
                     |  |  
			| 
				
					| 
					
					
 
 joy2bill
 
   | 
						
							| Whether it �s  �lazy �, spoken only or whatever we will all probably be teaching it as  �an exception � in 20 or 30 years time. It �s a perfect example of how English constantly evolves and how grammar can rapidly go  �out-of-date �. I personally hate  �wanna � but it appears daily in many students � work and who am I to argue against the people who write subtitles for movies. Good discussion! Joy |  14 Oct 2012     
					
                     |  |  
	< Previous  
 1    
2    
	
	   |