ESL Forum:
Techniques and methods
in Language Teaching
Games, activities
and teaching ideas
Grammar and
Linguistics
Teaching material
Concerning
worksheets
Concerning
powerpoints
Concerning online
exercises
Make suggestions,
report errors
Ask for help
Message board
|
ESL forum >
Grammar and Linguistics > help please
help please
janaesl
|
help please
|
which of the sentence is correct.
I am sorry for losing your book
or
I am sorry about losing your book.
thanks in advance |
13 Oct 2012
|
|
|
elwirafinka
|
Hi!
�for � is the correct option :)
|
13 Oct 2012
|
|
sugarpasa
|
I am sorry about your book
I am sorry for losing your book
:D
|
13 Oct 2012
|
|
cunliffe
|
Both the sentences you give are fine in that context. There is a difference between �sorry for� and �sorry about� and I�ll explain later (unless somebody else gets on and does it first.) I�m feeling lazy, sorry about that.
|
13 Oct 2012
|
|
libertybelle
|
I don �t see any difference. The blame for losing the book is the first person "I" in both cases.
Libertybelle
|
13 Oct 2012
|
|
|
joy2bill
|
Just to confuse you, I would probably say, "I �m sorry I lost your book." Much easier, quite natural and leaves out the tricky prepositions! |
14 Oct 2012
|
|
Apodo
|
Both your sentences are correct, as is joytobill �s. I am sorry for losing your book. I am sorry about losing your book. I �m sorry I lost your book. I would always use sorry for if expressing sympathy for a person in this context: I�m sorry for her, she looked so tired when I saw her. I found this:
http://forum.wordreference.com/showthread.php?t=2314106
They are both fine, and pretty much interchangeable, I
would say.
If the thing you�re sorry about is not actually your own fault, you can say
sorry about or sorry for.
If you feel you personally are at fault in some way, you�d probably say
"sorry for".
I�m sorry about the delay (there�s not much I can do about it, the
circumstances are beyond my control)
I�m sorry for the delay (if I/we had managed our time better, or organized
ourselves better, the delay might not have happened)
|
14 Oct 2012
|
|
|