ESL Forum:
Techniques and methods
in Language Teaching
Games, activities
and teaching ideas
Grammar and
Linguistics
Teaching material
Concerning
worksheets
Concerning
powerpoints
Concerning online
exercises
Make suggestions,
report errors
Ask for help
Message board
|
ESL forum >
Ask for help > placed?
placed?
Jorgelinaac
|
placed?
|
Hi everyone!!
I have a question regarding this sentence:
It �s a town placed next to the Uruguay River.
"located", "situated" sound correct to me, but is "placed" ok? I have checked it in the dictionary, yet it is not clear to me whether "placed" is correct in this context.
I would love to hear your opinion!
Thanks in advance!
Have a great week :)
Jorgelina |
3 Jun 2013
|
|
|
yanogator
|
Definitely not "placed", unless someone took an existing town and set it down next to the river. Bruce |
3 Jun 2013
|
|
cunliffe
|
Yep, Bruce is right (of course). Situated or located, but not placed. Is �set � acceptable? A town set next to the Uruguay river.... |
3 Jun 2013
|
|
edrodmedina
|
"Built" is another word that might fit. Ed
edit: "that was settled" could also
be used
|
3 Jun 2013
|
|
|
yanogator
|
Lynne, I would say that "set" is a rather poetic usage, but is acceptable. Bruce |
3 Jun 2013
|
|
douglas
|
Actually, a town CAN be "placed" near a river (in my opinion--it �s not often that I disgaree with Bruce)--it would be a VERY rare usage though. For example, near Dallas there is a city (can �t remember the name--something with Mustangs I think) that was completely planned, so the planners chose to place it where it now sits (kind of like a h�using project can be placed). That said, "located" or "situated" would be more fitting in most cases. Cheers, Douglas Edit: Las Colinas, is billed as the USA�s first "planned community"
|
4 Jun 2013
|
|
yanogator
|
OK, Douglas, I �ll agree that it can happen, but it still wouldn �t be quite right here, unless you are talking about the original placement. Once it has been placed there, it is then situated or located. Bruce |
4 Jun 2013
|
|
|
|