�This is not a question with only 1 answer.
I am not going to offer any �proof �, but am simply going to tell you.
If you are not satisfied with my answer(s), please feel free to do the research.
�
No native speaker would ever say (A),�(B) or (C).
�
One might change the sentence�slightly if offering an emphatic response to clear up a misunderstanding.
Example:
(1) Do your wear glasses in your eyes?
(2). No. I put glasses on and they rest ON my nose and ears.
�
For (C), again for emphasis, a native speaker might respond�like�this.
(1) Do you wear glasses in your eyes?
(2) No.�The glasses do not go�IN my eyes,�rather they go�OVER my eyes (in the �external � sense of the word, not the �under/over � sense of the word).
�
The only answer in a simple Q+A situation, where the responding speaker is speaking with emphasis for correction/to clear up a misunderstanding, would be (E).
�
This would almost certainly�happen in a conversation�wear the response is to say WHY the glasses are used.
(1) Do you�wear glasses for fashion?
(2) No. I wear them for vision correction / I wear glasses for my eyes.
�
Or...
�
(1) Why do you wear glasses?
(2) I wear them for my eyes... of course!
�
I hope that helps you.�
