Ahmed,
You raise some very interesting points.
Lynne Cunliffe makes excellent comments.
I don �t know whether young people would want to visit a time in History of political, artistic, or philosophical importance.
What would be my choice?
I would want to visit the time of my youth, perhaps 1935.
My classmates could all visit their young Parents, their Grandfathers and Grandmothers. They would see transport; entertainment; education; health; living conditions; cleanliness; public amenities; social welfare; and particularly, money and finance; as it was then, in comparison with now.
Was it REALLY as we all remember it?
Were people happier THEN, or now?
Was that fantastic holiday ALL fun and games?
Were the bad things REALLY BAD, and were the good things REALLY GOOD.
And this is where we begin to see the Counter-Arguments, the foolishness of trying to live, IN REALITY, past experiences!
Because we discover that the Beautiful Girl, who we first kissed and fell in love with, had kissed every other boy in the class!
The Teacher, we disliked, was adored by his family, for beautiful reasons that we were unable to see!
The handicapped Child, who we all scoffed, went on to outclass us in every aspect of life.
The Snob, who we hated, because he sneered at us, did so because he was envious of the �happy lives � that we lived.
The Rich Lady, who embarrassed us with unasked-for gifts, was a genuine, kind, loving person.
Seeing these people, as they REALLY WERE, would completely confuse us. These revelations, would probably make us doubt all of our ideas about the past, when compared to modern life. We would probably revise many of them.
And, possibly, most of all ... our Family and our Friends!
We might discover Secrets, which would be better if they remained unknown to us.
There are Pros and Cons about revisiting the past!
But, on consideration, I think that Curiosity would win!
It �s likely that we would decide to take the Risk!
We would probably all Enrol tomorrow!
Les Douglas