ESL Forum:
Techniques and methods
in Language Teaching
Games, activities
and teaching ideas
Grammar and
Linguistics
Teaching material
Concerning
worksheets
Concerning
powerpoints
Concerning online
exercises
Make suggestions,
report errors
Ask for help
Message board
|
ESL forum >
Grammar and Linguistics > Future Simple Question
Future Simple Question

ueslteacher
|
Future Simple Question
|
What kind of usage is this?
Don �t make so much noise, you �ll wake up the baby!
How to put it in simple English? Sophia |
3 Nov 2013
|
|
|

Pelletrine
|
Can �t see how you can make it much simpler...
IF you make that much noise, you �ll wake up the baby! Be quiet, or the baby will wake up!
I don �t understand your question: it �s a 0 degree conditionnel to my mind ... if you do so, this will happen. Hope it helps Have a nice evening |
3 Nov 2013
|
|

ueslteacher
|
I thought zero conditionals have Present Simple in both clauses  e.g. If my dog hears noise at the door, it barks. I thought there could be a word to describe the situation like with other cases (e.g. intention, prediction, opinion, promise, etc.)
|
3 Nov 2013
|
|

mohamedthabet
|
Stop making so much noise! Otherwise / or you will wake up the baby.
|
3 Nov 2013
|
|

Stellam
|
Hi I think it�s a prediction |
3 Nov 2013
|
|
|

Apodo
|
I think of it this way:
Don �t make so much noise because the noise made by you will wake the baby.
|
3 Nov 2013
|
|

pilarmham
|
You could also say:
You are going to wake up the baby.
I see no other possibility. I don �t think this structure is conditional. |
3 Nov 2013
|
|

ueslteacher
|
Predictions based on our opinions use future simple "will" Predictions based on evidence use "going to"
and here, in this particular case, which one is it? or is it a completely different usage and how can I prove it to my students on what grounds "will" is used here?
Edit: yes, Maria, I thought so too, but the key had "will"
|
3 Nov 2013
|
|

pilarmham
|
That �s it, a prediction in every sense.
Edit: I remember that example from a grammar book (probably Michael Swan�s). Both possibilities are correct. |
3 Nov 2013
|
|

ueslteacher
|
thanks for the hint about M.Swan, Maria, I now think that it �s "certainty" or even a "logical deduction" So, thank you:) Sophia |
3 Nov 2013
|
|
1
2
Next >
|